The Delhi High Court has ruled that a confession made by an accused person in a statement made in accordance with Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) is only admissible as corroborated evidence and cannot be used against another accused person. According to Justice Vikas Mahajan, the Court cannot determine guilt based only on the co-accused's confession. It is only after evaluating all available evidence and concluding that the accused is guilty that the Court may evaluate the co-accused's statement and be assured of the accused's guilt, the single judge said. Delhi Riots: Confessional Statements of Accused Not in Public Domain Cannot Be Published: HC. 

HC on Confession

(SocialLY brings you all the latest breaking news, viral trends and information from social media world, including Twitter, Instagram and Youtube. The above post is embeded directly from the user's social media account and LatestLY Staff may not have modified or edited the content body. The views and facts appearing in the social media post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY, also LatestLY does not assume any responsibility or liability for the same.)