Kashi Vishwanath Temple-Gyanvapi Mosque Dispute Case To Come Up for Hearing in Varanasi Civil Court Tomorrow
The Kashi Vishwanath temple-Gyanvapi mosque dispute case will now come up for hearing on Monday. In December 2019, advocate Vijay Shankar Rastogi had filed an application on behalf of Swayambhu Jyotirlinga Bhagwan Vishweshwar in the court of civil judge, requesting survey of the entire Gyanvapi compound by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI).
Varanasi, March 21: The Kashi Vishwanath temple-Gyanvapi mosque dispute case will now come up for hearing on Monday. In December 2019, advocate Vijay Shankar Rastogi had filed an application on behalf of Swayambhu Jyotirlinga Bhagwan Vishweshwar in the court of civil judge, requesting survey of the entire Gyanvapi compound by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI).
He had filed the petition as the 'next friend' of Swayambhu Jyotirlinga Bhagwan Vishweshwar. Later, in January 2020, Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee had filed an objection against the petition, also seeking survey of the entire Gyanvapi compound by the ASI. The first petition was filed in the Varanasi civil court in 1991 on behalf of Swayambhu Jyotirlinga Bhagwan Vishweshwar seeking permission for worship in Gyanvapi. Kashi Vishwanath Temple in Varanasi Imposes Dress Code on Devotees, Bans T-Shirts And Jeans Inside Sanctum Sanctorum.
The petitioner had contended that the Kashi Vishwanath temple was built by Maharaja Vikramaditya about 2,050 years ago, but Mughal emperor Aurangzeb destroyed the temple in 1664 and used its remains to construct a mosque, which is known as Gyanvapi masjid, on a portion of the temple land.
The petitioner had requested the court to issue directions for removal of the mosque from the temple land and give back its possession to the temple trust. The petition contended that the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act was not applicable on the suit as the mosque was constructed over a partly demolished temple and many parts of the temple exist even today.
In 1998, Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee moved the high court contending that the mandir-masjid dispute could not be adjudicated by a civil court as it was barred by the law. The high court stayed the proceedings in lower court which had continued for the past 22 years. In February 2020, the petitioners approached the lower court again with a plea to resume the hearing as the high court had not extended the stay in the past six months.
(The above story first appeared on LatestLY on Mar 21, 2021 11:28 AM IST. For more news and updates on politics, world, sports, entertainment and lifestyle, log on to our website latestly.com).