10% Quota For General Category Will Not be Put on Hold, Says Supreme Court

CJI Gogoi adjourned the case till March 28, when he would decided whether a Constitution Bench should be convened to adjudicate on pleas challenging the legal validity of the general category quota.

File image of Supreme Court of India | (Photo Credits: PTI)

New Delhi, March 11: Hearing a clutch of petitions challenging the validity of the 10 per cent quota for general category rolled out by the Centre in January this year, the Supreme Court on Monday said it will not put the affirmative action policy on hold. The bench led by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi asked the petitioners to submit a note of pointers detailing their objections to the new reservation law.

CJI Gogoi adjourned the case till March 28, when he would decided whether a Constitution Bench should be convened to adjudicate on pleas challenging the legal validity of quota for the poor among upper castes in government jobs and educational institutions. Upper Caste Reservation: Rajasthan Notifies 10 Per Cent Quota in Government Jobs.

Petitions in the case have been filed by civil society groups, including 'Janhit Abhiyan' and NGO 'Youth For Equality', challenging the Centre's decision.

The petition, filed by Youth For Equality through its president Kaushal Kant Mishra, has sought the quashing of the Constitution (103 Amendment) Act, 2019, saying that the economic criterion cannot be the sole basis for reservation and that the bill violates basic feature of the Constitution as reservation on economic grounds cannot be limited to the general category and the overall 50 per cent ceiling limit cannot be breached.

In the present form, the upper limit of quota goes up to 60 per cent which violated the decisions of the apex court.

Referring to the nine-judge bench decision of the apex court in the landmark 1992 Indira Sawhney case, the petition said the latest amendment completely violated the Constitutional norm that economic criterion cannot be the only basis of reservation.

It also said that the amendments fail to consider that Articles 14 and 16 form the basic feature of equality, and that they have been violated with the doing away of the restraints that were imposed on the reservation policy, i.e. the 50 per cent ceiling limit and the exclusion of economic status as a sole criterion.

Later in a press release, the organisation said in principle it's a welcome step and that deprivation and not caste has been made the basis of protective discrimination.

"However, the limit of total reservation is increased to 60 per cent. This will open a pandora's box. Now more and more political parties/caste groups will claim for increased percentage of reservations, both at the Centre and state level," it said.

The fresh filed by businessman Poonawalla has sought quashing of the bill, saying that backwardness for the purpose of reservation cannot be defined by "economic status alone".

The top court had earlier refused to stay the Modi government's decision to grant the reservation but agreed to examine the validity of the constitutional amendment which paved the way for this quota.

In poll year, the Modi government has come out with the constitutional amendment bill giving quota benefits to the poor among general category candidates.

The quota will be over and above the existing 50 per cent reservation to SCs, STs and Other Backward Classes (OBCs).

The Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha cleared the bill on January 8 and 9 respectively, and has been signed by President Ram Nath Kovind.

(With PTI inputs)

(The above story first appeared on LatestLY on Mar 11, 2019 03:52 PM IST. For more news and updates on politics, world, sports, entertainment and lifestyle, log on to our website latestly.com).

Share Now

Share Now