‘Emergency’: Bombay HC Seeks Decision on Kangana Ranaut’s Film’s Certification by September 25, Says 'Don't Want CBFC To Sit on the Fence’

The Bombay High Court on Thursday (September 19) said creative freedom and the freedom of expression cannot be curtailed and the censor board cannot refuse to certify a film just because there is an apprehension of a law and order problem. A division bench of Justices BP Colabawalla and Firdosh Pooniwalla expressed its displeasure with the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) for not taking a decision on the issuance of a certificate to Kangana Ranaut-starrer film Emergency, and ordered for the decision to be taken by September 25. ‘If Bhindranwale Is a Terrorist, ’Emergency’ Should Release’: Kangana Ranaut Opens Up About the Delay of Her Film. 

It asked if the CBFC thinks the people of this country are so naive to believe everything that is shown in a movie. On the petitioner's claim that the CBFC was delaying issuance of certificate to the movie due to political reasons, the HC noted the film's co-producer Ranaut was herself a sitting BJP parliamentarian and questioned if the ruling party was acting against its own MP. ‘Emergency’ Postponed: Kangana Ranaut Announces Delay of Her Directorial Debut Due to CBFC Clearance (View Post).

Watch 'Emergency' Trailer:

Ranaut, who has directed and co-produced the film besides playing the lead role of former prime minister late Indira Gandhi, earlier this week accused the CBFC of stalling certification to delay the release. The bench said, "You (CBFC) have to take a decision one way or the other. You must have the courage to say this film cannot be released. At least then we will appreciate your courage and boldness. We don't want the CBFC to sit on the fence."

The court was hearing a petition filed by Zee Entertainment Enterprises, seeking a direction to the CBFC to issue a certificate for the film "Emergency". The biographical drama, earlier scheduled for release on September 6, is caught up in controversy after Sikh organisations including the Shiromani Akali Dal objected, accusing the film of misrepresenting the community and getting historical facts wrong. The HC earlier this month refused to any urgent relief by directing the censor board to certify the movie immediately.

The court had said it cannot grant any urgent relief at this stage in wake of the directive issued by the Madhya Pradesh HC asking the censor board to consider objections to the movie before certifying it. The bench had then directed the censor board to take its decision on issuance of the certificate to the film by September 18.

On Thursday, senior counsel Abhinav Chandrachud, appearing for the CBFC, told the court that the board's chairman has referred the movie to the revising committee for final decision. Chandrachud said there was an element of apprehension of public disorder. Senior counsel Venkatesh Dhond, appearing for Zee Entertainment, said this was done just to buy time and ensure the movie does not release before October, when elections are to be held in Haryana.

The bench noted the CBFC had not complied with its earlier order and had simply passed the buck from one department to another. The HC said the entire exercise by the censor board had to be completed by September 18. It was not for the CBFC to come to a conclusion that there may be a law and order problem and hence a movie cannot be certified, it said. "This has to stop. Otherwise we are completely curtailing creative freedom and freedom of expression by doing all this," the HC said. "Does the CBFC think the public in this country is so naive and stupid to believe everything they see in films? What about creative freedom?" it asked.

The court also wondered as to why people have become so sensitive towards what is being shown in movies. "We don't see why people are so sensitive. My community is made fun of all the time in movies. We don't say anything. We just laugh and move on," Justice Colabawalla said in a lighter vein. While Chandrachud sought two weeks time, the court said the decision has to be taken by September 25. Dhond argued the movie was not being issued a certificate due to political reasons.

The bench, while questioning the political angle, asked if the petitioner was claiming the ruling party was itself against Ranaut, who is the co-producer of the film and also BJP Lok Sabha member.  "The co-producer herself is a BJP MP. She is also part of the ruling party. So you are saying her own party is against its member?" the court asked. Dhond claimed the ruling party was willing to displease a sitting parliamentarian just to appease a particular section of society. Zee Entertainment in its plea claimed the CBFC had already made the certificate for the movie but was not issuing it.