New Delhi, October 26: The Supreme Court of India has agreed to examine the validity of the age restriction of 35 years on women's reproductive rights for conducting pre-conception and pre-natal diagnostic tests.

A bench of justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Abhay S. Oka on October 17 issued a notice to the Centre and others on the aspects relating to age restriction only. Supreme Court Lawyer Collapses While Arguing Case, Doctor Called To Check on Advocate.

"Issue notice restricted to the aforesaid aspect," the court had said. The court was hearing a plea filed by petitioner-in-person Meera Karuna Patel, who is also an advocate.

Advocate Patel submitted that much water has flown since the petition was filed and amendments have been made but one aspect still needs consideration.  Supreme Court Sets Aside Appointment of MS Rajasree As Vice-Chancellor of APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University.

She referred to Section 4(3)(i) of the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 to contend that the age restriction of 35 years is a restriction on the reproductive rights of women and in view of the recent judgment of this Court titled "X vs. Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Another" the provision would not stand judicial scrutiny.

Section 4 of the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 deals with the regulation of pre-natal diagnostic techniques.

According to this section, no pre-natal diagnostic techniques shall be used or conducted unless the person qualified to conditions that the age of the pregnant woman is above thirty-five years.

In September, the Supreme Court had given a landmark judgment and held that all women are entitled to safe and legal abortion. The court had also said that the meaning of the rape must include marital rape for the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act.

(This is an unedited and auto-generated story from Syndicated News feed, LatestLY Staff may not have modified or edited the content body)