New Delhi, March 15: The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it will hear tomorrow the plea seeking to cancel bail to Union Minister of State for Home Affairs Ajay Mishra Teni's son Ashish Mishra, who is an accused in the Lakhimpur Kheri incident.

A bench headed by Chief Justice of India NV Ramana listed the matter to be heard on Wednesday saying that it will constitute the same bench tomorrow, who was earlier dealing with issues arising out of the Lakhimpur Kheri incident. Ashish Mishra, Arrested in Lakhimpur Kheri Violence Case, 'Evaded' Crucial Questions by Police.

Meanwhile, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the petitioner, said that soon one of the prime protected witnesses was brutally attacked, few days after the bail was granted to Ashish Mishra and the alleged attackers also said that now BJP has won the election they will take care of him.

Family members of the victims of the Lakhimpur Kheri incident have moved the Supreme Court challenging Allahabad High Court order, which granted bail to Ashish Mishra.

Also Read | Samsung Galaxy A33 5G Price & Specifications Emerge Online Ahead of Its Launch: Report.

In the Special Leave Petition, family members of the deceased have challenged the Allahabad High Court order dated February 10, 2022, wherein Ashish Mishra has granted regular bail. The petitioner said that the Allahabad HC's order is unsustainable in law. They also said that they have approached the Apex Court as the State of Uttar Pradesh has failed to prefer any appeal against the impugned order.

"The lack of any discussion in the High Court's order as regards the settled principles for grant of bail is on account of lack of any substantive submissions to this effect by the State as the accused wields substantial influence over the State government as his father is a Union Minister from the same political party that rules the State," read the petition.

"The impugned order is unsustainable in eyes of law as there has been no meaningful and effective assistance by the State to the court in the matter contrary to the object of the first Proviso to Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which provides that in grave offences notice of bail application should ordinarily be given to the Public Prosecutor," said the petitioner.

"Even the victims were prevented from bringing the relevant material as regards the settled principles for grant of bail to notice of High Court as their counsel 'got' disconnected from the hearing on 18.01.2022 before he could barely make any submissions and repeated calls to the court staff to get reconnected were to no avail and application filed by the victims/petitioners, " the petition said.

"Contrary to settled law, the High Court failed to form its opinion on the basis of the chargesheet on broad probabilities and has instead gone on the basis of far fetched imaginary possibilities. The observation of the High Court that, "there might be a possibility that the driver tried to speed up the vehicle to save himself, on account of which, the incident had taken place", is perverse especially when there was nothing on record to show the same and there is evidence in fact in the chargesheet to the contrary showing that the vehicles had been dashing at high speeds of 70-100 km/hr from the time they left the venue of the 'dangal'; when they passed the petrol pump; when they crossed the police crossing; all the way to the scene of the crime; and the same has been attested to by various eyewitnesses including police officials on duty," the petition said.

The petitioner said that Allahabad High Court has not considered the heinous nature of the crime; the character of the overwhelming evidence against the accused in the chargesheet; position and status of the accused with reference to the victim and witnesses; the likelihood of the accused fleeing from justice and repeating the offence; and the possibility of his tampering with the witnesses and obstructing the course of justice, while granting relief to the accused.

(This is an unedited and auto-generated story from Syndicated News feed, LatestLY Staff may not have modified or edited the content body)