K Kavitha Bail Plea: BRS Leader Moves Delhi High Court for Bail in Excise Policy Case
Recently Trial Court had refused to grant bail to her in both cases. The bench of Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma is scheduled to hear the matter on Friday. The bail petitions have been moved by Advocate Mohit Rao and Deepak Nagar representing her.
New Delhi, May 9: The Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) Leader K Kavitha on Thursday moved Delhi High Court seeking bail in connection with the cases investigated by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) related to the Delhi excise policy.
Recently Trial Court had refused to grant bail to her in both cases. The bench of Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma is scheduled to hear the matter on Friday. The bail petitions have been moved by Advocate Mohit Rao and Deepak Nagar representing her. Delhi Excise Policy Case: BRS Leader K Kavitha's Judicial Custody Extended Till May 14.
Kavitha through bail plea submitted that the entire ED case hinges upon statements made by the approver, witnesses or co-accused under Section 50 of the PMLA. The Prosecution Complaints do not put forth a single document which corroborates the statements. There is not a single piece of evidence which points to the guilt of the applicant.
She further stated that as the arrest of the applicant is illegal as section 19 of PMLA has not been complied with. Neither has any corroboration to the allegation of the actual cash transaction nor any money trail is forthcoming, therefore, the satisfaction of guilt as expressed in his arrest order is merely a sham and a pretense, she stated. K Kavitha Denied Bail: Delhi Court Denies Interim Bail to BRS MLC in Excise Policy Case.
On May 6, the Rouse Avenue Court of Delhi dismissed the bail petitions moved by Bharatiya Rashtra Samithi (BRS) leader K Kavitha in connection with CBI and ED cases related to excise policy case. Through plea, K Kavitha earlier alleged that the ruling party at the Centre is using investigative agencies to publicly connect the petitioner to the Delhi excise policy so that further coercive actions can be taken against her. The investigating agencies are well aware that there is no substance in the allegation of the petitioner's involvement in the alleged scam. The intention behind the purported investigation against the petitioner is not to ascertain her involvement in the alleged scam, since it is painfully clear that none exists.
The political masterminds are well aware that if the petitioner can be connected to the alleged scam, it will bring her, and by logical implication, her father, the erstwhile Chief Minister of Telangana, into disrepute. The political mileage gained from such actions can be used in the general elections scheduled for 2024. This is the sole and singular motive of the purported investigation. This is political propaganda at its shameful lowest, even by the not so high standards in Indian politics, stated bail plea.
BRS leader K Kavitha was arrested by the ED on March 15, 2024 and by the CBI on April 11, 2024. Earlier, CBI through remand application stated that "Kavitha Kalvakuntla was required to be arrested in the instant case to conduct her custodial interrogation for confronting her with the evidence and witnesses to unearth the larger conspiracy hatched among the accused, suspect persons regarding the formulation and implementation of the excise policy, as well as to establish the money trail of ill-gotten money generated and to establish the role of other accused/suspect persons, including public servants, as well as to unearth the facts which are in her exclusive knowledge."
The CBI inquiry was recommended based on the findings of the Delhi Chief Secretary's report filed in July showing prima facie violations of the GNCTD Act 1991, Transaction of Business Rules (ToBR)-1993, Delhi Excise Act-2009, and Delhi Excise Rules-2010, officials said.
The ED and the CBI had alleged that irregularities were committed while modifying the excise policy, undue favours were extended to licence holders, the licence fee was waived or reduced and the L-1 licence was extended without the competent authority's approval.
The beneficiaries diverted "illegal" gains to the accused officials and made false entries in their books of account to evade detection, the probe agencies said. As per the allegations, the excise department had decided to refund the earnest money deposit of about Rs 30 crore to a successful tenderer against the set rules.
Even though there was no enabling provision, a waiver on tendered licence fees was allowed from December 28, 2021, to January 27, 2022, due to COVID-19, the probe agency said and there was an alleged loss of Rs 144.36 crore to the exchequer.
(This is an unedited and auto-generated story from Syndicated News feed, LatestLY Staff may not have modified or edited the content body)