Chandigarh, Aug 9 (PTI) BJP leader Sanjay Tandon has challenged the election of Chandigarh MP Manish Tewari in the Punjab and Haryana High Court on several grounds, including "promises of a corrupt nature".

Tandon, who was the BJP candidate for the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, was defeated by Congress's Manish Tewari by a margin of 2,504 votes. The Congress and the Aam Aadmi Party had fought the election in an alliance.

Also Read | Firozabad Horror: Woman Dies After Husband Tortures Her Brutally, Inserts Rolling Pin Inside Her Private Parts in Uttar Pradesh; Accused Arrested.

Seeking setting aside of Tewari's election as a Member of Parliament, Tandon filed the petition in the high court through counsels Chetan Mittal, Ashu M Punchhi and Satyam Tandon, under the Representation People (RP) Act, 1951.

According to the petition, Tewari and party workers "indulged in various acts of omission and commission as various promises of a corrupt nature were made to target the innocent and poor voters."

Also Read | Manish Sisodia Released From Tihar Jail: AAP Leader Walks out of Jail After 17 Months, Says 'I Thank You All for Being With Me' (Watch Videos).

"Filling up of guarantee cards and posting videos to lure innocent voters into believing that if they vote for Tewari they will be compensated with Rs 8,500 per month, Rs 1 lakh salary for every first job of every educated youth will be provided and loan waiver and legal guarantee of MSP based on Swaminathan formula," the petition cited as some of these "promises".

It argued that the distribution of such "guarantee cards" was an attempt to register people for post-election schemes by way of advertisement in order to "deceptively inform voters that in case they vote for Tewari then a quid pro quo would be formed, which would lead to categoric pecuniary and financial benefit to the voter."

The petitioner contended that such practices as defined under Section 123 of the RP Act form part of the grounds for declaring the election as void under Section 100 and 101 of the RP Act.

The court has fixed September 9 as the date of hearing in the matter.

(This is an unedited and auto-generated story from Syndicated News feed, LatestLY Staff may not have modified or edited the content body)