India News | Allahabad HC Orders CBI Probe into Allegations Against DRT Presiding Officer

Get latest articles and stories on India at LatestLY. The Allahabad High Court on Thursday ordered the CBI to investigate into allegations against a now-retired presiding officer of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) while summoning a report of the action taken by the agency within 15 days.

Lucknow, Nov 21 (PTI) The Allahabad High Court on Thursday ordered the CBI to investigate into allegations against a now-retired presiding officer of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) while summoning a report of the action taken by the agency within 15 days.

The next hearing of the case will be on December 10.

Also Read | PM Modi on India-Guyana Similarities: 'Democracy First, Humanity First Our Mantra', Says PM Narendra Modi in Guyana's Parliament (Watch Video).

The order was been passed by a single bench in Lucknow of Justice Pankaj Bhatia on a petition filed on behalf of Bank of Baroda.

The petition states that the then presiding officer of DRT hearing the case passed an order against the petitioner bank (Bank of Baroda) in favour of the private respondents on September 18 while he (presiding officer) was not even present in the court on that day.

Also Read | Kaithal Fire: Blaze Erupts in 2 Mounds of Crop Residue in Haryana, Fire Tenders Present at Spot (Watch Video).

It was said that to remove this irregularity, the presiding officer issued a corrigendum order on September 27, saying that the order of September 18 should be read as the order of September 24.

It was argued that the petitioner's case was not listed on September 24 and the corrigendum order of September 27 was also not on record.

It was also told that the presiding officer retired on September 27 (2024) itself.

While hearing the matter, the court summoned the report and related records from the Registrar of DRT, and also asked for information from the stenographer of the presiding officer as to whether any order was dictated to him on September 18.

In compliance with the order, the Registrar stated in his report that the order was not written by the stenographer on September 18 and the corrigendum of September 27 was also written by an outsourced stenographer.

The court also found that serious allegations have been made against the same presiding officer in two other petitions in the past.

In one of the petitions, the central government was ordered to investigate and in the other case the hearing before the officer was stopped.

Considering all the circumstances, the court ordered the CBI to investigate the matter and file a charge sheet if anyone is found guilty.

(This is an unedited and auto-generated story from Syndicated News feed, LatestLY Staff may not have modified or edited the content body)

Share Now

Share Now