Chennai, Nov 20 (PTI) The Madras High Court Tuesday deprecated a magistrate for allowing a top journalist to make submissions when the editor of a Tamil magazine was produced for remand recently.

Tasking the magistrate to file a report on why and under what provisions of law he allowed former Editor-in-Chief of The Hindu, N Ram to make submissions in the case, Justice Anand Venkatesh observed that court proceedings should revolve around law and facts of the case.

The matter pertains to the arrest of Tamil magazine Nakkeeran's editor, R R Gopal last month and his release by XIII Metropolitan Magistrate, S Gopinathan.

The magistrate had rejected a police plea for remand, holding that there were no materials to do so.

Gopal was arrested in connection with the publication of alleged derogatory contents against Governor Banwarilal Purohit in Nakkeeran.

The judge before whom a challenge petition of the Tamil Nadu government came up for hearing Tuesday said court proceedings cannot be a platform for airing opinions.

The government's present plea was against the order of refusal of the magistrate to remand Gopal to judicial custody on October 9.

"This court is not happy with the manner in which the proceedings have been conducted by the court below. The court below has virtually converted the court into a public platform.

"This attitude of judges playing to the gallery should be stopped," the Judge noted after recording the submissions of the Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) representing the state government.

Judges shall be beyond such things and they are only expected to deal with cases placed before them, he said.

The judge in his order further said, "this court does not understand as to how the court below allowed N Ram to make submissions in this case. N Ram is a rank outsider in so far as this case is concerned. He did not have any locus standi to make any representation before the court."

Court proceedings cannot be made a platform for expressing public opinion and the court has to confine itself to the facts of every case and the law involved therein, he observed.

Referring to the record of submissions made by Ram, the judge said "the other disturbing factor as seen by this court is that the order passed by XIII Metropolitan Magistrate has recorded the submissions made by N Ram."

Earlier, the SPP, in his arguments, called strange, the magistrate court allowing the top journalist to make submissions on the freedom of press.

The prosecutor submitted that once the magistrate was satisfied that there were no sufficient materials for the remand, he could not have directed the accused person to execute a bail bond.

In this matter, the magistrate who had refused to remand Gopal directed him to execute bail bond for Rs 10,000 on condition that he should appear before police and court as and when required.

Under section 441 of the Criminal Procedure Code, such a bond is contemplated only for a person's release on bail and in this case the court did not even deem it fit to remand the accused person, the special public prosecutor argued.

The Judge directed the magistrate to file his report on or before November 28 and posted the matter to November 29.

(This is an unedited and auto-generated story from Syndicated News feed, LatestLY Staff may not have modified or edited the content body)